VRdigital.solutions
Independent product · not a VRdigital engagement

Every number in your capital program, able to face the regulator.

AIPP reads your asset register and produces a risk-ranked, multi-year capital program, with the evidence behind every score. It sits over the system you already run. Start from a spreadsheet export.

Talk to us about AIPP →Watch the 3-minute demo
Illustration · synthetic dataRanked program
Demo

Three minutes of the real application, on synthetic data.

No mock-ups. Every frame is the product itself: a ranked program, a plan sealed for approval, a refusal to let anyone approve their own plan, and every decision on the ledger.

The AIPP demonstration. Narrated walkthrough, about three minutes, with captions.
The Today page: three items that need the planner, ordered by what blocks the programme, beside the evidence-strength score.
What needs you todayThe things blocking the program, in order, instead of a wall of dashboards.
An asset detail showing the chain from corporate objective to funded work, with the factors behind its priority.
Why is this asset funded?Corporate objective to asset in one view, with the evidence behind its rank.
The ranking page previewing a weight change and naming the assets that move, before it is applied.
See the consequence firstMove a weight and see which assets change rank before anything is saved.
An approval dialog refusing an approval because the same person submitted the plan.
No self-approvalSegregation of duties is enforced by the server, and the reason is shown.
The evidence page showing the weakest dimension as the headline, with six dimensions listed.
Evidence as the weakest linkSix dimensions, never averaged, and what to measure next.
The decision ledger listing a weight change with the number of assets that moved and the reason given.
Every decision on the ledgerWho changed what, how many assets moved, and why.
What it does

From asset register to board paper, on one traceable line.

SCORE

Risk on every asset

Likelihood times consequence, by asset class, with condition graded on a 1 to 5 scale. Every score breaks down into its factors.

DECIDE

Value-ranked programs

Treatments ranked by value per dollar. Test a budget what-if and see the cost of deferral before you commit.

DEFEND

Evidence you can hand over

Plans freeze into named baselines you can compare year on year. Evidence packs are sealed so anyone can check nothing changed.

Test it

Do not take the claim. Test it.

Every vendor in this market claims something. Ours is four short statements, and each one has a test you can run on your own data.

"Over the system you already run"Test itPoint AIPP at your register. An export will do. If it demands a migration off your asset, GIS or finance system before it produces anything, the claim is false.
"Against a real budget constraint"Test itSet a budget below what the need requires, then halve it. A tool that returns the same list, only shorter, is sorting. Optimising changes what gets funded.
"Cites the governing instrument"Test itOpen any score and ask what it answers to. The instrument should be named, with whether it is implemented or only referenced, on the same screen.
"Refuses what the evidence will not support"Test itLoad your worst class: the one with missing condition data and costs from years ago. If everything comes back scored and the ranking looks clean, it is defaulting your gaps.
Who it is for

Built for the people who own the risk.

Capital planning fails in the seams between roles. AIPP is written for each seat at the table.

OperationsAsset and engineering managersThe register is mostly right and fully relied upon. Rank what to fix first, and prove why.
TechnicalAsset system and GIS leadsAsset IDs that never reconcile across systems. Work from an export, without a migration.
GovernanceData governance and complianceMeasurable data quality, with provenance on every figure.
ProcurementPanel and tender evaluatorsA credibility checklist, answered honestly, including what is still pending.
ExecutiveCFO, COO and CIOCapital efficiency, the cost of deferral, and a business case your audit committee can question.
Honest

Where we are weak, in writing.

What you should weigh

  • This is a young product. If your procurement weights reference customers heavily, that is a fair reason to rank us lower.
  • The shipped risk coefficients are representative figures until they are calibrated against your failure history.
  • Published method tables come from the standards and from you. We ship the method, not the tables.

What AIPP is not

  • It decides what to fund. It is not an asset management system and does not execute the work.
  • It is validated against your own standard during onboarding. It is never described as "certified" out of the box.
  • It is an independent product, with its own commercial terms, separate from any VRdigital engagement.
How it lands

Three steps. No consulting engagement.

  1. 1ConnectStart from a spreadsheet or CSV export. Data quality is scored on the way in. Incomplete records are ingested and flagged, not rejected.
  2. 2Configure by industryApply your industry pack. Weights, value profile and report set are configured, and your engineers tune them from there.
  3. 3DefendFreeze the baseline. Generate the report packs. Hand the sealed evidence to your auditor, your board or your regulator.

See it on your own data.

A paid pilot turns one asset class into a ranked program and an evidence pack you keep. Tell us about your register and we will say honestly whether AIPP fits.

Talk to us about AIPP →

Book a consultation